雲端發票抽獎4人重複中獎 引爆發票兌獎誠信問題 財政部當慎重應對

圖片取自財政部臉書,統一發票113年78月份兌獎

雲端發票抽獎活動4人中獎2次,震撼財政機關舉辦發票兌獎公正性

昨日有網友貼出「雲端種樹趣e 起集點樹」三期抽獎卻有4人中獎2次,有網紅向AI詢問母數有9萬人參予抽獎之下,4人重複中獎的可能性比連續被隕石打中兩次還低。舉辦活動的台北國稅局立即發新聞稿,說明抽獎流程,且「每期抽獎均辦理公開記者會,符合抽獎資格名單均在律師見證下匯入抽獎系統,在記者會現場公平公正公開抽出」,並表示此時正查證重複中獎情形,將適時對外說明查證結果。
現階段,網友的熱議還在延燒中,有懷疑這起雲端抽獎活動中獎不公/舞弊,該不會是「內部抽獎」?「內定里里民抽獎」?也有認為主管機關抬出律師見證、過程公開,這類說詞像極了某卸任市長調高容積全過程都有官員與專家把關;更有不少網友進而懷疑不僅僅雲端發票兌獎,乃至於整體發票兌獎越發難中,是否也存在人為「貓膩」?
發票抽獎、兌獎公正性,一方質疑,一方試圖護衛。在那之前,值得先瞭解發票獎金與相關預算的由來與本質

發票獎金與預算是全體消費者掏腰包貢獻的「公共財」

發票獎金的預算來自於營業稅法第58條,全年營業稅收入提撥3%,用作「防止逃漏、控制稅源及促進統一發票之推行,財政部得訂定統一發票給獎辦法」,這條規定最早來自民國54年,換句話說,發票給獎制度至今已快60年的歷史了!
發票獎金規模有多少?以財政部114年規劃,統一發票給獎及推行經費達到187.8億元,較113年度增加35.4億元,如此驚人的發票獎金規模(約政府總預算的5%)源自於近年消費市場的蓬勃成長帶動營業稅收的挹注,因此所提撥的三趴的發票獎金,既是源自營業稅收,而所有中獎的大戶與小戶,本身就是「亂數」(希望真如此)地享受全體消費者在買東西時,額外貢獻的5%營業稅負擔
所以,現在網友熱議、質疑,發票兌獎、抽獎的公正性,財政部當然有責任向國人證明獎金分配的公正性,其背後正因為那些發票獎金是從全體消費者荷包所掏出來而累積的「公共財」
發票獎金作為公共財,將近60年的時間裡,不斷地「亂數」分配,藉此制約消費者主動索取統一發票、雲端歸戶,但不只是充作獎金的基金,發票獎金的預算還可供主管機關「推動各項宣傳、資料調查及稽查之費用、檢舉之獎金、統一發票發售及專責單位所需經費」(統一發票給獎辦法第16條)。這也是為什麼我們常常看到財政機關以推廣發票的名義,時不時舉辦各式各樣的路跑、登山活動。當然也包括這次有爭議性的「雲端種樹趣e 起集點樹」活動所贈送的ipad與自行車,這也是來自消費者掏腰包的貢獻!

待財政部化解此波公關挑戰  進一步思考發票給獎制度的優化或改革

不過,發票獎金要怎麼用,怎麼分派才符合公正公平公開,同時實現防止逃漏、控制稅源的初始目的,也避免浮濫使用,變相成為不透明的機關小金庫,先等財政部妥善化解這波質疑發票兌獎公正性的公關挑戰,之後值得公眾乃至於立法機關進一步思考,已經運行近60年的發票給獎制度是否有優化乃至改弦更張的可能空間。

English Summary

A recent cloud-based lottery event in Taiwan, “e-tree point collection,” sparked controversy when four individuals won twice, raising questions about the integrity of the system. With over 90,000 participants, a popular influencer noted that the odds of this happening were extraordinarily low. In response, Taipei’s National Tax Bureau issued a statement detailing the transparency of the lottery process, asserting that all entries undergo verification and drawing in the presence of lawyers to ensure fairness. An investigation into these duplicate wins is currently underway.

This incident has triggered broader discussions online, with some accusing the lottery system of potential favoritism or internal manipulation. Concerns were voiced about whether the system is genuinely random, especially given that prize funding—sourced from 3% of Taiwan’s annual sales tax revenue—has been publicly allocated for nearly 60 years. The accumulated funds serve both as incentives for consumers to request receipts and as a public asset to control tax evasion and promote uniform receipts(GUIs). Critics argue that the Ministry of Finance must demonstrate transparent and fair prize distribution, as these prizes are essentially “public assets” funded by consumers.

The controversy has spotlighted the broader use of lottery funds, which finance various public initiatives, including promoting GUI usage through events like marathons and other activities, such as this contested “e-tree” event. As the Ministry of Finance navigates these integrity concerns, there may be calls for legislative oversight to ensure transparent and purposeful use of these funds.

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *